lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: CONFIG_MARKERS
From(Frank Ch. Eigler)
DateTue, 22 Jan 2008 22:00:33 -0500
Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> writes:

> I notice in module.c:>> #ifdef CONFIG_MARKERS> 	if (!mod->taints)
> 		marker_update_probe_range(mod->markers,
> 			mod->markers + mod->num_markers, NULL, NULL);
> #endif
>
> Is this an attempt to not set a marker for proprietary modules? [...]

I can't seem to find any discussion about this aspect.  If this is the
intent, it seems misguided to me.  There may instead be a relationship
to TAINT_FORCED_{RMMOD,MODULE}.  Mathieu?
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-23 03:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2008