Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: CONFIG_MARKERS | | From | (Frank Ch. Eigler) | | Date | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:00:33 -0500 |
Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com> writes:
> I notice in module.c:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MARKERS
> if (!mod->taints)
> marker_update_probe_range(mod->markers,
> mod->markers + mod->num_markers, NULL, NULL);
> #endif
>
> Is this an attempt to not set a marker for proprietary modules? [...]
I can't seem to find any discussion about this aspect. If this is the
intent, it seems misguided to me. There may instead be a relationship
to TAINT_FORCED_{RMMOD,MODULE}. Mathieu?
- FChE
|  |