lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: crash in kmem_cache_init
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Mel Gorman wrote:

> Rather it should be 2. I'll admit the physical setup of this machine is
> .... less than ideal but clearly it's something that can happen even if
> it's a bad idea.

Ok. Lets hope that Pekka's find does the trick. But this would mean that
fallback gets memory from node 2 for the page allocator. Then fallback
alloc is going to try to insert it into the l3 of node 2 which is not
there yet. So another ooops. Sigh.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-23 00:17    [W:1.124 / U:1.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site