Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:51:33 -0800 (PST) | From | Martin Knoblauch <> | Subject | Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX |
| |
----- Original Message ---- > From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com> > To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>; Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>; Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>; Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com>; Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>; jplatte@naasa.net; Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>; James.Bottomley@steeleye.com; Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>; Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>; Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 3:39:33 PM > Subject: Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX > > > See if these patches make any difference: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/agk/patches/2.6/editing/ > > dm-md-merge_bvec_fn-with-separate-bdev-and-sector.patch > dm-introduce-merge_bvec_fn.patch > dm-linear-add-merge.patch > dm-table-remove-merge_bvec-sector-restriction.patch >
nope. Exactely the same poor results. To rule out LVM/DM I really have to see what happens if I setup a system with filesystems directly on partitions. Might take some time though.
Cheers Martin
| |