Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 2 Jan 2008 21:02:23 +1100 (EST) | | From | James Morris <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Exporting capability code/name pairs |
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > Another issue is that securityfs depends on CONFIG_SECURITY, which might be
> > undesirable, given that capabilities are a standard feature.
>
> We can implement this feature on another pseudo filesystems.
> Do you think what filesystem is the best candidate?
> I prefer procfs or sysfs instead.
Sysfs makes more sense, as this information is system-wide and does not
relate to specific processes.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
|  |