lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 2 Jan 2008 21:02:23 +1100 (EST)
FromJames Morris <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Exporting capability code/name pairs
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, KaiGai Kohei wrote:

> > Another issue is that securityfs depends on CONFIG_SECURITY, which might be
> > undesirable, given that capabilities are a standard feature.
> 
> We can implement this feature on another pseudo filesystems.
> Do you think what filesystem is the best candidate?
> I prefer procfs or sysfs instead.

Sysfs makes more sense, as this information is system-wide and does not 
relate to specific processes.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-02 10:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2008