lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped files
From
Date

On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 11:15 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 10:51 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> > > diff --git a/mm/msync.c b/mm/msync.c
> > > index a4de868..a49af28 100644
> > > --- a/mm/msync.c
> > > +++ b/mm/msync.c
> > > @@ -13,11 +13,33 @@
> > > #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> > >
> > > /*
> > > + * Scan the PTEs for pages belonging to the VMA and mark them read-only.
> > > + * It will force a pagefault on the next write access.
> > > + */
> > > +static void vma_wrprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned long addr;
> > > +
> > > + for (addr = vma->vm_start; addr < vma->vm_end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > > + spinlock_t *ptl;
> > > + pgd_t *pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr);
> > > + pud_t *pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
> > > + pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> > > + pte_t *pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> > > +
> > > + if (pte_dirty(*pte) && pte_write(*pte))
> > > + *pte = pte_wrprotect(*pte);
> > > + pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
> > > + }
> > > +}
> >
> > What about ram based filesystems? They don't start out with read-only
> > pte's, so I think they don't want them read-protected now either.
> > Unless this is essential for correct mtime/ctime accounting on these
> > filesystems (I don't think it really is). But then the mapping should
> > start out read-only as well, otherwise the time update will only work
> > after an msync(MS_ASYNC).
>
> page_mkclean() has all the needed logic for this, it also walks the rmap
> and cleans out all other users, which I think is needed too for
> consistencies sake:
>
> Process A Process B
>
> mmap(foo.txt) mmap(foo.txt)
>
> dirty page
> dirty page
>
> msync(MS_ASYNC)
>
> dirty page
>
> msync(MS_ASYNC) <--- now what?!
>
>
> So what I would suggest is using the page table walkers from mm, and
> walks the page range, obtain the page using vm_normal_page() and call
> page_mkclean(). (Oh, and ensure you don't nest the pte lock :-)
>
> All in all, that sounds rather expensive..

Bah, and will break on s390... so we'd need a page_mkclean() variant
that doesn't actually clear dirty.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-18 11:29    [W:0.085 / U:2.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site