lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] input: psmouse: fix input_dev leak in lifebook driver
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:58:01PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:04:01 -0500
> Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:12:52PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > >
> > > The lifebook driver may register a second input device, but it never
> > > unregisters it. This fixes that.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>
> >
> > Applied, thank you Andres.
> >
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> There's one additional patch, I don't know if you saw it; the subject
> was "check return value of input_register_device() in hil_ptr.c's init".
>

I have seen it but postponed for later. Right now I am trying to get though
2.6.24 material.

>
> Also, I've found myself needing to provide my own device_attribute for
> the OLPC psmouse driver; I couldn't use PSMOUSE_DEFINE_ATTR(), as its
> set_helper callback calls psmouse_disable.
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR(powered, S_IWUSR | S_IRUGO, hgpk_show_powered,
> hgpk_set_powered);
>
> Unfortunately, in order to not be racy, hgpk_set_powered needs to
> deal with psmouse_mutex. Which method of dealing with this would
> you prefer? I could either make psmouse_mutex no longer static,
> provide psmouse_mutex locking functions (declared in psmouse.h), or
> put psmouse_mutex into 'struct psmouse'. Or, if you have any other
> ideas..

Could you just send me the code? I tend to think better when I see it...

Thanks!

--
Dmitry


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-16 20:19    [W:1.130 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site