![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 16-01-08 09:00, Rene Herman wrote: > On 16-01-08 06:55, Dave Young wrote: > >> I noticed the port number changed to 40 in 2.6.24-rc8, but it's not >> enough for me still. > > Yes, that's known. In .23 even more were (silently) ignored though. > Since .24-rc8 you should at least get just 1 warning (per resource type) Assuming, that is, that Linus would've applied Len's trivial fix here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/14/251 > and if all's well .25 should kill the static limit completely. Rene. | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-01-16 13:11 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||