lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Subject[PATCH] x86: add is_f00f_bug helper to fault_32|64.c
From
Date
Further towards unifying these files, add another helper
in same spirit as is_errata93. Add an #ifdef around the
forward declaration of do_invalid_op to make it clear it
is only needed in the one place.

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
index 936bb0c..f50df86 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
@@ -211,8 +211,6 @@ void dump_pagetable(unsigned long address)
printk("\n");
}

-void do_invalid_op(struct pt_regs *, unsigned long);
-
static inline pmd_t *vmalloc_sync_one(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long address)
{
unsigned index = pgd_index(address);
@@ -288,6 +286,28 @@ static int is_errata93(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
return 0;
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG
+void do_invalid_op(struct pt_regs *, unsigned long);
+#endif
+
+static int is_f00f_bug(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG
+ unsigned long nr;
+ /*
+ * Pentium F0 0F C7 C8 bug workaround.
+ */
+ if (boot_cpu_data.f00f_bug) {
+ nr = (address - idt_descr.address) >> 3;
+
+ if (nr == 6) {
+ do_invalid_op(regs, 0);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+ return 0;
+}

/*
* Handle a fault on the vmalloc or module mapping area
@@ -570,21 +590,8 @@ bad_area_nosemaphore:
return;
}

-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG
- /*
- * Pentium F0 0F C7 C8 bug workaround.
- */
- if (boot_cpu_data.f00f_bug) {
- unsigned long nr;
-
- nr = (address - idt_descr.address) >> 3;
-
- if (nr == 6) {
- do_invalid_op(regs, 0);
- return;
- }
- }
-#endif
+ if (is_f00f_bug(regs, address))
+ return;

no_context:
/* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
index cde110c..17cafe8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
@@ -256,6 +256,29 @@ static int is_errata93(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
return 0;
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG
+void do_invalid_op(struct pt_regs *, unsigned long);
+#endif
+
+static int is_f00f_bug(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG
+ unsigned long nr;
+ /*
+ * Pentium F0 0F C7 C8 bug workaround.
+ */
+ if (boot_cpu_data.f00f_bug) {
+ nr = (address - idt_descr.address) >> 3;
+
+ if (nr == 6) {
+ do_invalid_op(regs, 0);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+ return 0;
+}
+
static noinline void pgtable_bad(unsigned long address, struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long error_code)
{
@@ -572,6 +595,9 @@ bad_area_nosemaphore:
return;
}

+ if (is_f00f_bug(regs, address))
+ return;
+
no_context:
/* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
if (fixup_exception(regs))
--
1.5.4.rc2.1164.g6451


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-16 03:53    [W:0.035 / U:1.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site