lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 15 Jan 2008 17:12:01 +0800
From"yawei niu" <>
Subjectdoesn't nfs_access_cache_shrinker() race with umount?
Hi, NFS/VFS gurus

nfs_access_cache_shrinker() calls igrab() without serialized with
umount process, looks that might cause the "busy inode" after umount,
doesn't it?

I think we need to serialize the generic_shutdown_super() and
nfs_access_cache_shrinker() just like the dcache/icache shrinker, am I
understanding right?

Thanks
- Niu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-15 08:15    [W:0.227 / U:0.070 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans