lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 14 Jan 2008 13:13:47 +0100
FromCornelia Huck <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/7] driver-core : add class iteration api
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:47:54 +0800,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> wrote:

Minor style suggestion (same for class_find_child):

> +struct device *class_find_device(struct class *class, void *data,
> +				   int (*match)(struct device *, void *))
> +{
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	int error = 1;

How about using inverse logic here (e.g., start with int found = 0)...

> +
> +	if (!class)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	down(&class->sem);
> +	list_for_each_entry(dev, &class->devices, node) {
> +		dev = get_device(dev);
> +		if (dev) {
> +			if (match(dev, data)) {
> +				error = 0;

...and set found = 1 here...

> +				break;
> +			} else
> +				put_device(dev);
> +		} else
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	up(&class->sem);
> +
> +	if (error)
> +		return NULL;
> +	return dev;

...and do
	return found ? dev : NULL;
in the end?

Especially since not finding the device is not really an error.

> +}

Otherwise this looks fine to me.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-14 12:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2008