lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 13/22 -v2] handle accurate time keeping over long delays
From
Date

On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 15:15 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I'm trying to figure out all the ramifications of the new
> > "cycle_accumulated" field. Does it really need to be
>
> John,
>
> Before we hardcode these names, can we change them? Later in the series I
> use something called 'cycle_raw' which really should be called
> 'cycle_accumulated'. Since cycle_accumulated IIRC can go backwards.

Err... I don't think the current cycle_accumulated can go backwards. Or
maybe I'm missing what you mean.

> Or do you think I should rename cycle_raw to cycle_monotonic?

That's fine by me either way.

thanks
-john




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-10 21:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans