[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 13/22 -v2] handle accurate time keeping over long delays

    > I'm trying to figure out all the ramifications of the new
    > "cycle_accumulated" field. Does it really need to be


    Before we hardcode these names, can we change them? Later in the series I
    use something called 'cycle_raw' which really should be called
    'cycle_accumulated'. Since cycle_accumulated IIRC can go backwards.

    Or do you think I should rename cycle_raw to cycle_monotonic?

    -- Steve

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-01-10 21:19    [W:0.029 / U:4.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site