Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:15:58 -0500 (EST) | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 13/22 -v2] handle accurate time keeping over long delays |
| |
> I'm trying to figure out all the ramifications of the new > "cycle_accumulated" field. Does it really need to be
John,
Before we hardcode these names, can we change them? Later in the series I use something called 'cycle_raw' which really should be called 'cycle_accumulated'. Since cycle_accumulated IIRC can go backwards.
Or do you think I should rename cycle_raw to cycle_monotonic?
-- Steve
| |