![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com writes: > This makes 32 bit cpa similar to x86_64 and makes it easier for following PAT > patches. Please don't do this -- that would be a nightmare merging with my CPA series. This means adding the _addr() entry point is ok (although it should not be needed on i386 because it doesn't do the end_pfn_mapped trick), but not a wide scale refactoring. -Andi | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-01-10 20:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||