![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hello Jeff, "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek": > Unless I missunderstood something, Unionfs uses the same approach. Even > Unionfs's ODF branch does the same thing. The major difference is that we > keep the cache in a file on a disk. The approach unionfs-2.1.2 took differs from mine. Major difference is, - in this approach, the cache in struct file is the completed virtual disk block for the dir. - readdir doesn't have to call vfs_readdir when the cache exists and is valid. simply calls filldir. - it supports SEEK_END. Junjiro Okajima - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-09-10 04:21 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||