[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: sata & scsi suggestion for make menuconfig
    On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 23:22 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > The current setup expresses the dependencies as they exist -- OPTIONAL
    > > extras, and that is a problem once a year or so, when someone builds
    > Disk support over SCSI/SATA is hardly an "optional extra". It's more the 99+%
    > case.

    Using that argument, there's an equal case for always requiring SCSI to
    be built for every kernel, since very few people can boot a system
    without a disk. However, the 1% case is the embedded flash booting
    community plus a few others, so we allow SCSI to be optional for our 1%
    who don't want it.

    At base, the Kconfig system is designed to give the greatest flexibility
    with the fewest foot shooting opportunities. However, we do tend to err
    on the side of flexibility if there's a conflict between the two design

    > > their own kernel but must learn this fact anew.
    > When it costs 10000 people half an hour to learn and correct this it
    > wasted 5000 hours of previous livetime.
    > Besides there is no good reason to have ever learned this imho.

    The process of becoming an expert in the kernel build system naturally
    involves making mistakes and learning from them, so this is probably
    time reasonably well spent.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-09 23:41    [W:0.027 / U:41.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site