[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: broken ACPI NUMA config option
On Sat, 2007-08-09 at 18:51 -0400, James C. Georgas wrote:
> If I select X86_64_ACPI_NUMA, then ACPI_NUMA is (properly) selected
> automatically, but ACPI is not selected automatically. This causes
> ACPI_NUMA to not be built, and the kernel compile fails with unresolved
> symbols.

Uh, it seems that I'm getting different results this time. Now,
X86_64_ACPI_NUMA does select ACPI, but PM (parent of ACPI) is not
automatically selected. Same result for the compile, though. Boom.

I seem to get different behaviour in general on subsequent runs of make

For example, the last time I ran it, I was able to select K8_NUMA and
X86_64_ACPI_NUMA, independently of one another.

This time, though, the visibility of K8_NUMA is dependent on whether or
not X86_64_ACPI_NUMA is selected.

Should K8_NUMA and X86_64_ACPI_NUMA both be under NUMA, and independent
of one another?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-09 01:37    [W:0.073 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site