[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: broken ACPI NUMA config option
    On Sat, 2007-08-09 at 18:51 -0400, James C. Georgas wrote:
    > If I select X86_64_ACPI_NUMA, then ACPI_NUMA is (properly) selected
    > automatically, but ACPI is not selected automatically. This causes
    > ACPI_NUMA to not be built, and the kernel compile fails with unresolved
    > symbols.

    Uh, it seems that I'm getting different results this time. Now,
    X86_64_ACPI_NUMA does select ACPI, but PM (parent of ACPI) is not
    automatically selected. Same result for the compile, though. Boom.

    I seem to get different behaviour in general on subsequent runs of make

    For example, the last time I ran it, I was able to select K8_NUMA and
    X86_64_ACPI_NUMA, independently of one another.

    This time, though, the visibility of K8_NUMA is dependent on whether or
    not X86_64_ACPI_NUMA is selected.

    Should K8_NUMA and X86_64_ACPI_NUMA both be under NUMA, and independent
    of one another?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-09 01:37    [W:0.020 / U:5.740 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site