lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:00:01 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:07:34 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > Changelog:
> > - markers_mutex now nests inside module_mutex rather than the opposite.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> > Reviewed-by: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
>
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches recognizes Signed-off-by: and
> Acked-by:. Nothing about Reviewed-by. Quote:
>
> Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker
> has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance.
>
> Reviewed-by: carries no such connotation or indication IMO.
> Please use Acked-by if that's what these reviewers have done.

Yeah. We will start introducing Reviewed-by: (I haven't yet quite worked
out how yet) but it will be a quite formal thing and it would be something
which the reviewer explicitly provided. For now, let's please stick with
acked-by (if those individuals did indeed send an acked-by)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-07 01:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans