lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRE: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch for Intel Tolapai
    Date
    From
    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: Gaston, Jason D
    >Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:10 AM
    >To: 'Jeff Garzik'
    >Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    >Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch
    for
    >Intel Tolapai
    >
    >This device has both AHCI and RAID modes that use the ahci driver.
    Only
    >the RAID mode DID's are being added as the PCI class code support will
    >cover the AHCI mode. Looking at the Generic, PCI class code support
    >section, it uses "board_ahci". I assumed that they should be the same
    as
    >the generic class code support is working on this platform.
    >
    >Thanks,
    >
    >Jason
    >
    >
    >>-----Original Message-----
    >>From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com]
    >>Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 12:47 AM
    >>To: Gaston, Jason D
    >>Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
    >>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch
    for
    >>Intel Tolapai
    >>
    >>Jason Gaston wrote:
    >>> Resend trying to remove 8-bit characters in the email.
    >>>
    >>> This patch adds the Intel Tolapai RAID controller DID's for SATA
    >support.
    >>>
    >>> Signed-off-by: Jason Gaston <jason.d.gaston@intel.com>
    >>>
    >>> --- linux-2.6.23-rc4/drivers/ata/ahci.c.orig 2007-08-27
    >>18:32:35.000000000 -0700
    >>> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc4/drivers/ata/ahci.c 2007-08-28
    >16:58:11.000000000 -
    >>0700
    >>> @@ -411,6 +411,8 @@
    >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x292f), board_ahci_pi }, /* ICH9M */
    >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x294d), board_ahci_pi }, /* ICH9 */
    >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x294e), board_ahci_pi }, /* ICH9M */
    >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x502a), board_ahci }, /* Tolapai */
    >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x502b), board_ahci }, /* Tolapai */
    >>
    >>Why did you not use board_ahci_pi? Is the AHCI ports-implemented
    >>register unreliable on this platform?

    Jeff,

    Do I need to change this to board_ahci_pi or is it ok to leave it at
    board_ahci, which will be used by the AHCI class code devices?

    Thanks,

    Jason
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-06 19:31    [W:0.033 / U:32.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site