[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 0/3 coding standards documentation/code updates
    In message <>, Linus Torvalds writes:
    > On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Erez Zadok wrote:
    > >
    > > Would you prefer if CodingStyle was reorganized or even split into (1)
    > > general principles and (2) details? Perhaps we need a CodingStylePrinciples
    > > and a CodingStyleDetails?
    > I'm certainly ok with the split into two files.
    > What I'm not ok with is really important stuff (indentation), and then
    > mixing in silly rules ("parenthesis are bad in printk's"?)
    > Linus

    OK, looking at CodingStyle, I see two kinds of chapters. The first is stuff
    that's more generic to C, and the other is more specific to Linux and how
    one codes in the linux kernel. So I propose the following:

    1. we create a new file called CodingSuggestions

    2. we keep in CodingStyle the following chapters

    Chapter 1: Indentation
    Chapter 2: Breaking long lines and strings
    Chapter 3: Placing Braces and Spaces
    Chapter 4: Naming
    Chapter 5: Typedefs
    Chapter 6: Functions
    Chapter 7: Centralized exiting of functions
    Chapter 8: Commenting
    Chapter 9: You've made a mess of it

    Note: I'd suggest we rename the title of ch9 to "Custom Editor
    Programming/Indentation Modes" or something more descriptive.

    Chapter 10: Kconfig configuration files
    Chapter 11: Data structures
    Chapter 12: Macros, Enums and RTL
    Chapter 15: The inline disease
    Chapter 16: Function return values and names
    Chapter 18: Editor modelines and other cruft

    3. move the following chapters to CodingSuggestions:

    Chapter 13: Printing kernel messages
    Note: ch13 is the one which mentions the don't put parentheses around %d.

    Chapter 14: Allocating memory
    Chapter 17: Don't re-invent the kernel macros
    Chapter 19: branch prediction optimizations (the un/likely debacle)

    4. We go through and ensure that every test in checkpatch is
    documented either in CodingStyle or in CodingSuggestions, determined by
    whether checkpatch considers it an ERROR, WARNING, or just CHECK.

    I think the above chapter split will be a reasonable start, and of course we
    can tweak things over time. The general idea is that CodingStyle will
    remain largely unchanged (until such day as the kernel is rewritten in Java
    :-), while CodingSuggestions will evolve over time and be kept in sync with

    But, there's something really nice abuot having to point people to just one
    file instead of two. We could also keep it all in one file, but split it
    into two parts:

    Part 1: Mandatory Coding Style
    Chapter 1: indentation

    Part 2: Coding Style Suggestions
    Chapter n: printing kernel messages

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-30 06:03    [W:0.028 / U:62.240 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site