lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/fsstack/eCryptfs updates/cleanups/fixes
    Date
    Erez Zadok wrote:
    > Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
    > all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we
    > test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes
    > over 24 hours straight to get through all of our regressions :-)

    I am impressed, thanks!

    It's probably a good idea to always point these backports out, whenever
    submitting patches against -mm. Otherwise, people might forget.

    > So we'd be happy to submit those patches to the latest stable kernel.
    > But, are you talking about VFS/ecryptfs patches (which are in the stable
    > kernel), or are you talking about Unionfs (which is not)?

    I'm talking about Unionfs, which seems like a rather critical feature to
    miss-out on. BTW, did you ever get that oops-on-umount worked out?


    Thanks!

    --
    Al

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-03 20:31    [W:0.027 / U:0.200 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site