[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL -mm] Unionfs/fsstack/eCryptfs updates/cleanups/fixes
Erez Zadok wrote:
> Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
> all in Before we release any change, we
> test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes
> over 24 hours straight to get through all of our regressions :-)

I am impressed, thanks!

It's probably a good idea to always point these backports out, whenever
submitting patches against -mm. Otherwise, people might forget.

> So we'd be happy to submit those patches to the latest stable kernel.
> But, are you talking about VFS/ecryptfs patches (which are in the stable
> kernel), or are you talking about Unionfs (which is not)?

I'm talking about Unionfs, which seems like a rather critical feature to
miss-out on. BTW, did you ever get that oops-on-umount worked out?



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-03 20:31    [W:0.053 / U:1.784 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site