Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival | From | Bernd Petrovitsch <> | Date | Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:39:06 +0200 |
| |
On Fre, 2007-09-28 at 00:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 27 September 2007, you wrote: > > > Then you don't have to change every single printk in the kernel, but > > > only those that don't currently come with a log level. More importantly, > > > you can do the conversion without a flag day, by spreading (an empty) > > > PRINTK_CONTINUED in places that do need a printk without a log level. > > > > The problem is, how do you know whether to print a continued printk or not? > > It depends on the loglevel of the first printk. > > Those need to be looked at individually. You can normally see easily from
If think you misunderstood: Say, you compile out everything of DEBUG level. Say, you have a continued printk() after each and every pr_debug().
Then how is the macro supposed to know (at compile-time) that the continued printk() actually belongs to a DEBUG printk (and not another one)?
Bernd -- Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/ mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55 Embedded Linux Development and Services
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |