[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Patches for tiny 386 kernels, again. Linux kernel
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:24:20 -0400 Bill Davidsen wrote:

> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > This seems reasonable, so I tried to use it. Here are the results
> > and comments and meta-comments.
> >
> >
> > 1. Please forcibly wrap text lines in mail body at around column 70-72.
> >
> > 2. Put patches inline in the mail body, not as attachments.
> >
> I'll offer this suggestion, knowing it may piss you off, given the
> difficulty of preserving whitespace on *many* mailers without using
> attachments, and given that attachments can be saved easily without
> prying them out of the message, why don't you (one person) switch to a
> capable mail agent, if only for patches, instead of trying to teach many
> people to jump through hoops to avoid whitespace issues?

Is "you" referring to me? You didn't piss me off.
I don't even understand what you are talking about.

BTW, lots of us have capable mail clients.

> Not criticizing, just seems easier for everybody for you to avoid
> teaching people things they don't find useful elsewhere, or getting
> discouraged and not bothering.

(again, if "you" are referring to me:) I generally try to help
people. Another option is just to give them no feedback and drop
their patches. I think that's not useful or helpful at all.

Phaedrus says that Quality is about caring.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-29 00:01    [W:0.237 / U:2.296 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site