[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: correct kernel parameter in documentation.
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Dave Jones wrote:

> 'noacpi' isn't a standalone parameter, give it its prefix.
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 4d175c7..a87bc58 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -863,6 +863,10 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
> lasi= [HW,SCSI] PARISC LASI driver for the 53c700 chip
> Format: addr:<io>,irq:<irq>
> + libata.noacpi [LIBATA] Disables use of ACPI in libata suspend/resume
> + when set.
> + Format: <int>
> +

if you're going to add that libata-related parm to the kernel parms
file, wouldn't it make sense for consistency to add the other
available boot-time parms from libata-core.c as well? it seems
counter-productive to document only a subset of them from the same
source file.


p.s. as i think i've mentioned before, i'd prefer to see that entire
kernel-parameters.txt file reorganized, where the basic boot time
parms are at the top, followed by module specific parameters *after*
that, in alphabetical order by module name. i think that would make
far more sense.

Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-27 18:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean