[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: correct kernel parameter in documentation.
    On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Dave Jones wrote:

    > 'noacpi' isn't a standalone parameter, give it its prefix.
    > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <>
    > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
    > index 4d175c7..a87bc58 100644
    > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
    > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
    > @@ -863,6 +863,10 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is defined in the file
    > lasi= [HW,SCSI] PARISC LASI driver for the 53c700 chip
    > Format: addr:<io>,irq:<irq>
    > + libata.noacpi [LIBATA] Disables use of ACPI in libata suspend/resume
    > + when set.
    > + Format: <int>
    > +

    if you're going to add that libata-related parm to the kernel parms
    file, wouldn't it make sense for consistency to add the other
    available boot-time parms from libata-core.c as well? it seems
    counter-productive to document only a subset of them from the same
    source file.


    p.s. as i think i've mentioned before, i'd prefer to see that entire
    kernel-parameters.txt file reorganized, where the basic boot time
    parms are at the top, followed by module specific parameters *after*
    that, in alphabetical order by module name. i think that would make
    far more sense.

    Robert P. J. Day
    Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
    Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-27 18:07    [W:0.022 / U:12.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site