[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Chroot bug
Alan Cox wrote:
>> Good call. Though I suppose, since it's used 24x7 to aid security on
>> countless production servers, that security dwarfs testing. Still,
>> debugging, yes that's valid.
>> I don't suppose it makes and difference; whatever the purpose, a chroot
>> that doesn't change the root is buggy.
> It does change the root, it just doesn't guarantee you can't change it
> back - which is correct POSIX, Unix, SuS behaviour. So either everyone
> else is wrong or you are.. I know who I am betting on

Charming. They really say that, do they? Where? I find no such thing,
and I looked. I did find Open Groups SuS which, similar to SCO's UNIX,
> The dot-dot entry in the root directory is interpreted to mean the
> root directory itself. Thus, dot-dot cannot be used to access files
> outside the subtree rooted at the root directory.

I feel I've presented a good case that that it's a bug. You made a
somewhat rude counter-claim, which I don't ascribe to malevolence.
You're simply disinterested. Nobody else cares, so why expend effort on
it, right? I'll let it drop, but it is a bug.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-26 12:27    [W:0.116 / U:1.112 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site