Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | | Subject | [PATCH] just rename call_rcu_bh instead of making it a macro | | From | Steven Rostedt <> | | Date | Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:17:47 -0400 |
| |
Seems that I found a box that has a config that passes call_rcu_bh as a function pointer (see net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c), so declaring the call_rcu_bh has a macro function isn't good enough.
This patch makes it just another name of call_rcu for rcupreempt.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Index: linux-2.6.23-rc8-rt1/include/linux/rcupreempt.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.23-rc8-rt1.orig/include/linux/rcupreempt.h +++ linux-2.6.23-rc8-rt1/include/linux/rcupreempt.h @@ -42,9 +42,14 @@ #include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <linux/seqlock.h> -#define rcu_qsctr_inc(cpu) -#define rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu) -#define call_rcu_bh(head, rcu) call_rcu(head, rcu) +#define rcu_qsctr_inc(cpu) do { } while (0) +#define rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu) do { } while (0) +/* + * Someone might want to pass call_rcu_bh as a function pointer. + * So this needs to just be a rename and not a macro function. + * (no parentheses) + */ +#define call_rcu_bh call_rcu extern void __rcu_read_lock(void); extern void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |