lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] module: implement module_inhibit_unload()
From
Date
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 10:40 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > My concern is that you're dropping the module mutex around ->exit now.
> > I don't *think* this should matter, but it's worth considering.
>
> We always did that. Before the patch the code segment looked like the
> following.

Hi Tejun,

Thanks, misread patch.

> > I really wonder if an explicit "kill_this_attribute()" is a better way
> > to go than this...
>
> I think this sort of temporary unload blocking would be useful for other
> cases like this.

I hope not: this doesn't work in general. Calling into a module after
->exit has called assumes that the exit function doesn't free up or
overwrite stuff the other functions need.

Cheers,
Rusty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-25 04:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site