[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 6/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 10:56:32AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> I don't have a problem with a samples/ directory except (as I have
> already pointed out) it means that people will end up having to look
> in 2 places for the information that they need, i.e., both in
> samples/ and in Documentation/. So I really don't see a big need
> to split the samples and docs.
> What's wrong with building sample code in the Documentation/ directory?

It's not really documentation, it's code :) If you want to build
documentation from the samples use kerneldoc or similar to extrace the
comments. Having Documentation/ purely for things not affecting the build
make things a whole lot clearer, but if you absolutely insist on it
we can put it under Documentation/ as long as it's fully integrated into
kbuild and will be built as part of allmodconfig, unlike the current
two patches showing code there.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-24 20:03    [W:0.097 / U:4.664 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site