Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | [PATCH] [32/45] x86_64: hide cond_syscall behind __KERNEL__ | Date | Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:45:14 +0200 (CEST) |
| |
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
This brings x86_64 into line with all other architectures by only defining cond_syscall() when __KERNEL__ is defined.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
---
include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: linux/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h =================================================================== --- linux.orig/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h +++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h @@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigaction(int sig #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ #endif /* __NO_STUBS */ +#ifdef __KERNEL__ /* * "Conditional" syscalls * @@ -683,5 +684,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigaction(int sig * but it doesn't work on all toolchains, so we just do it by hand */ #define cond_syscall(x) asm(".weak\t" #x "\n\t.set\t" #x ",sys_ni_syscall") +#endif /* __KERNEL__ */ #endif /* _ASM_X86_64_UNISTD_H_ */ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |