[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival
On Thursday 20 September 2007 4:22:37 pm Jared Hulbert wrote:
> > > I think that this idea is not worth it.
> Don't use the config option then....
> > My problem is that switching off printk is the single biggest bloat
> > cutter in the kernel, yet it makes the resulting system very hard to
> > support. It combines a big upside with a big downside, and I'd like
> > something in between.
> It's not such a big downside IMHO. You can support a kernel without
> printk. Need to debug the kernel without printk? Use a JTAG
> debugger...

I don't actually own a jtag. (I do use qemu's gdb support to debug the target
kernel, but it's darn awkward and has limited hardware support.)

> If you have a system that actually configures out printk's, chances
> are you don't have storage and output mechanisms to do much with the
> messages anyway. Think embedded _products_ here.

I plead the fifth.

> Sure the
> development boards have serial, ethernet, and all that jazz but tens
> of millions of ARM based gadgets don't.

I wonder if that "Monsoon" gadget does? (Sorry, just on my mind today...)

"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
- Ken Thompson.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-20 23:55    [W:0.162 / U:4.520 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site