Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:10:42 +0100 | From | Andy Whitcroft <> | Subject | Re: [Celinux-dev] [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival |
| |
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:38:55AM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> Andrew, you're completely right... The patches should all aim at being > included into mainline or die. > > I'm finishing a sequence of crazy weeks and I will have time to send you > patches one by one next week, starting with the easiest ones.
Well thats good news. In response to the comments made about testing the impact of these patches on big-iron I was going to suggest we ask Andrew to include your patch set in -mm so that it firstly gets at least compiled on big-iron, and secondly so we could think about how to test with some of the options enabled on big-iron.
Knowing nothing about these options, from a test perspective it would be nice if we were able to simply enable "the lot" so we can do "normal" -mm runs and "tiny" -mm runs without any manual intervention?
-apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |