![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > > > --- kernel/softlockup.c~fix 2007-09-02 04:23:49.000000000 +0530 > > +++ kernel/softlockup.c 2007-09-02 04:34:45.000000000 +0530 > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > Ick, I botched a trivial patch, it doesn't even apply. Updated one below > (with indentation fix as added bonus :-) > > > [PATCH -mm] softlockup-improve-debug-output.patch fix (v2) > > kernel/softlockup.c: In function 'softlockup_tick': > kernel/softlockup.c:125: warning: 'regs' is used uninitialized in this function > > is a genuine bug (will cause an oops in all probability, or cause > wrong info to be printed, if we're lucky). So let's fix the > softlockup-improve-debug-output.patch to actually work as intended. > > Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <satyam@infradead.org> Thanks! Not sure how that bug slipped in, in my tree it does this: + struct pt_regs *regs; ... + regs = get_irq_regs(); Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-09-02 14:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||