![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > so unmodified CFS is 4.6% faster on this box than with Roman's > > > > patch and it's also more consistent/stable (10 times lower > > > > fluctuations). > > > > > > Was SCHED_DEBUG enabled or disabled for these runs? > > > > debugging disabled of course. (your patch has a self-validity > > checking function [verify_queue()] that is called on SCHED_DEBUG=y, > > it would have been unfair to test your patch with that included.) > > I'll look into it next week. thanks. FYI, there's plenty of time - i'll be at the KS next week so i'll be quite unresponsive to emails. Would be nice if you could take a quick look at the trivial patch i posted today though. How close is it to your algorithm, have i missed any important details? (not counting nice levels and rounding, it's just a quick & dirty prototype to show the first layer of the core math and nothing more.) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-09-02 21:25 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||