Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c | From | Johannes Berg <> | Date | Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:13:48 +0200 |
| |
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 18:05 +0200, Christian Kujau wrote: > but given the amount of changes currently > going into net/ I thought this might be interesting: > > [15604.137408] RTNL: assertion failed at net/core/dev.c (2595)
> [15604.138807] [<c038c612>] __dev_set_promiscuity+0xc2/0xd0 > [15604.139163] [<c038c9bb>] dev_set_promiscuity+0x1b/0x40 > [15604.139515] [<f91cb3fb>] VNetBridgeStartPromisc+0x2b/0x50 [vmnet]
Not sure why this would be interesting. Clearly, dev_set_promiscuity is called without the RTNL held while it should be. And see who the caller is?
johannes [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |