lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 4/7] Immediate Values - i386 Optimization
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> Cross-cache-line, sure. But what about just not sizeof aligned? If its
> enough to avoid cross-cache-line, then that's simpler.
>

Not really. It pretty much comes down to the same problem.

> Which is something I was going to comment on: Mathieu, you try to align
> the constant itself, but you don't prevent the instruction overall from
> crossing a cache line. Given how delicate all this stuff is, it seems
> like a good idea to do that.

Given how delicate all his stuff is, it would be interesting to know the
magnitude of the expected payoff, which I personally don't remember seeing.

-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-19 19:47    [W:0.127 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site