lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
DateMon, 17 Sep 2007 11:53:50 +0400
FromPavel Emelyanov <>
Subject[PATCH 3/5][9PFS] Cleanup explicit check for mandatory locks
The __mandatory_lock(inode) macro makes the same check, but
makes the code more readable.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Cc: Ron Minnich <rminnich@sandia.gov>
Cc: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>

---
 fs/9p/vfs_file.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
index 2a40c29..7166916 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int v9fs_file_lock(struct file *f
 	P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_VFS, "filp: %p lock: %p\n", filp, fl);
 
 	/* No mandatory locks */
-	if ((inode->i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == S_ISGID)
+	if (__mandatory_lock(inode))
 		return -ENOLCK;
 
 	if ((IS_SETLK(cmd) || IS_SETLKW(cmd)) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-17 09:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2008