lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 15 Sep 2007 11:00:52 +0300
FromAvi Kivity <>
SubjectRe: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> To me this is the beginning of fragmentation. Why do we need different
> and VMM-specific Linux paravirtualization for hardware-assisted
> virtualization? That would not be good for Linux.
>
> 

The only way to have a single interface is if a central authority
defines and documents that interface, and all hypervisor implementors
agree not to implement extensions.  Do you see that happening?

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-15 10:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2008