lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 14 Sep 2007 17:08:23 -0500
FromAnthony Liguori <>
SubjectRe: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, see, the initial goal was to make it possible to use the KVM
>> paravirtualizations on other hypervisors.  However, I don't think this
>> is really going to be possible in general so maybe it's better to just
>> use leaf 0.  I'll let others chime in before sending a new patch.
>> 
>
> Hm.  Obviously you can just define a signature for "kvm-compatible
> hypercall interface" and make it common that way, but it gets tricky if
> the hypervisor supports multiple hypercall interfaces, including the kvm
> one.  Start the kvm leaves at 0x40001000 or something?
> 

Yeah, that works with me.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>     J
>
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-15 00:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2008