[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] fs: define file_fsync() even for CONFIG_BLOCK=n
    On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:06:10AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
    > There's nothing that is problematic for file_fsync() with CONFIG_BLOCK=n,
    > and it's built in unconditionally anyways, so move the prototype out to
    > reflect that. Without this, the unionfs build bails out.

    Unionfs should stop using it instead.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-12 11:33    [W:0.019 / U:21.692 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site