lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
    Paul Menage wrote:
    > On 9/10/07, Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> On 10/09/2007, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
    >>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >>>> objection ;) "cpuctlr" isn't memorable. Kernel code is write-rarely,
    >>>> read-often. "cpu_controller", please. The extra typing is worth it ;)
    >>> Ok! Here's the modified patch (against 2.6.23-rc4-mm1).
    >> as everyone seems to be in a quest for a better name... I think, the
    >> obvious one would be just 'group_sched'.
    >>
    >
    > But "sched" on its own could refer to CPU scheduling, I/O scheduling,
    > network scheduling, ...
    >
    > And "group" is more or less implied by the fact that it's in the
    > containers/control groups filesystem.

    "control groups" is the name of your framework. right ?

    > So "group_sched" isn't really all that informative. The name should
    > definitely contain either "cpu" or "cfs".

    "cfs" control group subsystem.

    "cfs" looks good enough to identify the subsystem.

    C.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-09-11 09:23    [W:0.021 / U:2.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site