[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:46:51PM -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Abstracting away direct uses of TASK_ flags allows us to change the
> definitions of the task flags more easily.
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static int has_stopped_jobs(struct pid *pgrp)
> struct task_struct *p;
> do_each_pid_task(pgrp, PIDTYPE_PGID, p) {
> - if (p->state != TASK_STOPPED)
> + if (is_task_stopped(p))

Funny how I can't spot these things before I send them.

Fixed locally; I'll see if anyone else spots a problem before I send out
a v3.

Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-02 04:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site