Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:47:10 +0900 (JST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH 04/10] sysctl: Fix neighbour table sysctls. | From | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <> |
| |
Hello.
In article <m1zm108axi.fsf_-_@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (at Thu, 09 Aug 2007 18:56:09 -0600), ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) says:
> > - In ipv6 ndisc_ifinfo_syctl_change so it doesn't depend on binary > sysctl names for a function that works with proc. > > - In neighbour.c reorder the table to put the possibly unused entries > at the end so we can remove them by terminating the table early. > > - In neighbour.c kill the entries with questionable binary sysctl > handling behavior. > > - In neighbour.c if we don't have a strategy routine remove the > binary path. So we don't the default sysctl strategy routine > on data that is not ready for it. >
I disagree. It is bad to remove existing interface. Ditto for other patches.
Regards,
--yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |