lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] at91 pm: Compilation fix for at91sam926x
    Date

    > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200)
    > > at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1); /*
    > > self-refresh mode */

    > Why don't use:
    > if (cpu_is_at91rm9200())
    > at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1);

    What is the benefit?
    Will the optimizer remove the code if the CPU is not the at91rm9200?

    Best Regards
    Ulf Samuelsson
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-10 00:53    [W:0.022 / U:4.204 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site