lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 9 Aug 2007 08:59:16 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: Question: RT schedular : task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, structtask_struct *p) : decreases overhead when rq->nr_running == 1
* Mitchell Erblich <erblichs@earthlink.net> wrote:

> First, RT/RR tasks are not deprecated. [...]

I'm confused, do you say this in reference to anything i said? I did not 
say that RR tasks are deprecated and you were top-posting so i cannot 
connect it to anything specific. I only said RR tasks are _rare_:

>> this is a pretty rare codepath because the overwhelming majority of 
>> RT apps uses SCHED_FIFO [...]

and i hope you can see the difference between 'rare' and 'deprecated' 
;-) And i suspect you also missed the last bit of what i wrote:

>> So this is on several levels an uncommon workload and by adding a 
>> check like that we'd increase the codesize. But ... no strong 
>> feelings against this optimization - if you send a proper patch we 
>> can apply it, it certainly makes sense from a logic POV.

and you also missed the first bit it appears:

>> your change is a possible optimization, [...]

so you are banging, with full force, on completely open doors =B-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-09 09:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2008