[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on frv
    Chris Snook wrote:
    > From: Chris Snook <>
    > Make atomic_read() volatile on frv. This ensures that busy-waiting
    > for an interrupt handler to change an atomic_t won't get compiled to an
    > infinite loop, consistent with SMP architectures.

    To head off the criticism, I admit this is an oversimplification, and true
    busy-waiters should be using cpu_relax(), which contains a barrier. As
    discussed in recent threads, there are other cases which can be optimized by
    removing the need for a barrier, and having behavior consistent with
    architectures where the benefit is more profound is also valuable.

    -- Chris
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-09 19:03    [W:0.020 / U:31.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site