[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: why are some atomic_t's not volatile, while most are?
    Chris Snook wrote:

    > This is not a problem, since indirect references will cause the CPU to
    > fetch the data from memory/cache anyway.

    Isn't Zan's sample code (that shows the problem) already using indirect

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-08 06:53    [W:0.020 / U:18.416 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site