[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: why are some atomic_t's not volatile, while most are?
Chris Snook wrote:

> This is not a problem, since indirect references will cause the CPU to
> fetch the data from memory/cache anyway.

Isn't Zan's sample code (that shows the problem) already using indirect

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-08 06:53    [W:0.039 / U:7.144 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site