[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] UIO: Documentation
    On 19/07/2007, Greg Kroah-Hartman <> wrote:
    > From: Hans J. Koch <>
    > Documentation for the UIO interface
    > +<para>If you use UIO for your card's driver, here's what you get:</para>
    > +
    > +<listitem>
    > + <para>if you need to keep some parts of your driver closed source,
    > + you can do so without violating the GPL license on the kernel.</para>
    > +</listitem>
    > +</itemizedlist>
    > +

    Do we really want this?

    In my oppinion we run the risk here of encouraging behaviour akin to
    what NVidia is doing - release a small kernel "glue" module and then
    keep the driver proper in a binary blob (in userspace, but still a
    binary blob).
    If the company goes out of business and take their driver source with
    them then users are left with a useless, un-debugable, un-maintainable
    binary blob.
    Don't we instead want to encourage/pressure people to release specs
    and/or source code for their hardware/drivers so open, modifiable
    drivers can be written?

    This opens the door for people to start writing closed drivers. In the
    long run that seems to me like a bad deal for our users.

    Jesper Juhl <>
    Don't top-post
    Plain text mails only, please
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-08 23:39    [W:0.023 / U:14.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site