lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: PAT support for i386 and x86_64
    On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:42:17AM -0400, Cédric Augonnet wrote:
    > changing this register is absolutely not the actual issue with PAT, but
    > don't
    > you think such a first step is needed to avoid conflicts since people _do_
    > already set that register from their driver.

    Which drivers do that? Ok, I know the ATI 3d driver does, but if that
    crashes the users know who is to blame.

    No, I don't think we should merge a potentially data corrupting "first
    step.". Even first steps have to meet some standards.

    > Of course there is no problem for that being dependant on a CONFIG_PAT.

    I don't think a CONFIG_DATA_CORRUPTION is a good idea.

    -Andi
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-08 18:03    [W:2.559 / U:0.912 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site