![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 8/7/07, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote: > > The typical annotation would be using spin_lock_nested/mutex_lock_nested > with a non-0 nesting level for this one case. > OK, I'll look into this when I get back from vacation. Thanks, Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-08-07 20:29 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||