[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] msleep() with hrtimers

On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> > There's no problem to provide a high resolution sleep, but there is also
> > no reason to mess with msleep, don't fix what ain't broken...
> John Corbet provided the patch because he had a problem with the current
> msleep... in that it didn't provide as good a common case as he
> wanted... so I think your statement is wrong ;)

Only under the assumptation, that msleep _must_ be "fixed" for all other
current users too.
Give users a choice to use msleep or nanosleep, how do you know what's
"best" for them?

bye, Roman
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-06 12:05    [W:0.095 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site