[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] msleep() with hrtimers

    On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

    > > There's no problem to provide a high resolution sleep, but there is also
    > > no reason to mess with msleep, don't fix what ain't broken...
    > John Corbet provided the patch because he had a problem with the current
    > msleep... in that it didn't provide as good a common case as he
    > wanted... so I think your statement is wrong ;)

    Only under the assumptation, that msleep _must_ be "fixed" for all other
    current users too.
    Give users a choice to use msleep or nanosleep, how do you know what's
    "best" for them?

    bye, Roman
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-08-06 12:05    [W:0.020 / U:46.864 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site