[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/10] foundations for reserve-based allocation
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> We want a guarantee for N bytes from kmalloc(), this translates to a demand
> on the slab allocator for 2*N+m (due to the power-of-two nature of kmalloc
> slabs), where m is the meta-data needed by the allocator itself.

The guarantee occurs in what context? Looks like its global here but
allocations may be restricted to a cpuset context? What happens in a
GFP_THISNODE allocation? Or a memory policy restricted allocations?

> So we need functions translating our demanded kmalloc space into a page
> reserve limit, and then need to provide a reserve of pages.

Only kmalloc? What about skb heads and such?

> And we need to ensure that once we hit the reserve, the slab allocator honours
> the reserve's access. That is, a regular allocation may not get objects from
> a slab allocated from the reserves.

From a cpuset we may hit the reserves since cpuset memory is out and then
the rest of the system fails allocations?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-06 19:59    [W:0.206 / U:8.512 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site